Skip to main content

Britain’s social mobility problem has been misunderstood – education is not the great leveller

This story was originally published at Theconversation Erzsebet bukodi
For two decades, social mobility has been a central concern in British politics. Increasing equality of opportunity, in the context of rising inequalities between people’s lives, has been a shared goal across the party political spectrum. Politicians have also agreed that educational policy is crucial to achieving this goal. This has made the thrust of speeches on social mobility given over the years by politicians including Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Theresa May interchangeable.
Yet, new research I’ve published with my colleague John Goldthorpe, which brings together results from extensive British birth cohort studies, points to a severe disconnect between the discussion of social mobility in political and policy circles and the findings of sociological research.
In our analysis, we treat social mobility regarding social class and make a clear distinction between absolute and relative mobility rates. Perfect rates simply refer to the proportions of individuals who have moved to different class positions to those of their parents, whether in an upward or downward direction. Relative rates compare the chances of individuals from different class origins ending up in a different class “destination”.
Contrary to what has become widely claimed in the media, mainly as a result of – often misunderstood – research by economists, social mobility in Britain is not in decline.
Absolute rates of class mobility between generations have been stable at least over the period since World War II. Men and women today are just as likely to be found in different class positions to those of their parents as they were in the 1950s.
The important change is, however, that rates of upward mobility are falling and rates of downward mobility are rising, as our research and the graph above shows. In this sense, young people now face less favourable mobility prospects than their parents or grandparents did. This is the result of the slowdown in the steady growth of managerial and professional employment that drove increasing mobility upward in the “golden age” from the 1950s up to the 1980s.
Relative rates of social mobility are also essentially stable: the inherent “stickiness” between the class positions of parents and children has altered little over at least the last half-century. And in the case of “long-range” mobility – between, say, the lower stratum of the working class and those in managerial and professional jobs – quite extreme inequalities in relative chances exist.
Our findings show that the children of parents in higher managerial and professional positions are 20 times more likely to end up in such positions, rather than in working class positions, than children of working-class parents are.

Not a low mobility society

Education plays a vital role in determining whether a person is a class mobile or immobile. But it does not follow that more education means more mobility at a societal level. For education to promote mobility at a societal level, the association between a person’s class origins and their educational attainment must weaken, while the association between their educational attainment and their class destinations must strengthen. But as our research shows, neither of these changes is in fact apparent. And that’s especially the case if education is considered in relative terms: for example if an account is taken of the fact that a degree is worth far more in the labour market if only 10% of a birth cohort have one than if 40% do.
Again, contrary to what is widely claimed in the reports such as those by the Social Mobility Commission, Britain is not a distinctively low mobility society. Across European countries, rates of absolute class mobility are very similar. And as regards relative rates, Britain is one of a group of West-Nordic countries that show – comparatively – high fluidity within their class structures.
One reason for this is that, in Britain, education is not class destiny to the same extent as it is in a country such as Germany. In Germany and several other Western-Central European countries, the educational system is highly stratified, with early selection for different types of school. Because there is then a tight link between formal educational qualifications and employment opportunities, educational inequalities are rather systematically translated into labour market inequalities. Where such “credentialism” prevails, education can, in fact, prove a barrier to, as much as a source of, social mobility.

No great leveller

Education is not “the great leveller” that can break the link between inequality in the conditions under which people live and inequality of opportunity. Parents with superior resources – economic, as well as social and cultural ones – will use their resources as necessary to give their children a competitive edge. Those wealthy enough can resort to the private sector, but for others the “commercialisation of opportunity” occurs by buying houses in the catchment areas of high-performing state schools, engaging private tutors for their children, and providing them with extensive out-of-school activities and experiences designed to improve their academic performance.
In this together. asife/Shutterstock
In addition, further education, or lifelong learning, turns out to promote immobility rather than mobility. As my research shows, it mainly gives “second chances” to those from more advantaged backgrounds whose performance in mainstream education gave them insufficient assurance that they would be able to maintain their parents’ position. It primarily serves to prevent downward mobility.
So far as absolute mobility is concerned, the most effective way of increasing upward mobility would be through economic and social policies that could renew the expansion of managerial and professional employment, so as to bring back the conditions of the golden age. One way of equalising relative rates of social mobility would be for employers to develop internal promotion and training policies to take full advantage of the educationally “wasted talent” that exists among their workforces and to remove requirements for formal qualifications of an irrelevant kind.
But in all societies with a capitalist market economy, a conjugal family system and liberal-democratic policies, a limit may exist on the extent that mobility chances can be equalised. As this limit is approached, policies aimed at further equalisation will become increasingly contested, and social mobility will cease to be a matter on which political consensus prevails.


Popular posts from this blog

Best Plagiarism Checkers for eLearning Experts | Free and Paid Plagiarism detection tools

Plagiarism can is an endlessly running battle in the academic sphere. With the technological enhancements, however, we are more capable to detect plagiarism than ever. Good Plagiarism checkers can be time-saving for students and organizations to prevent academic fraud.

But not all software is good enough. Also, it profoundly depends on your need to learn which plagiarism checker you should use. For example, Organizations which are directly involved in academic research can use Turnitin, Grammarly or Plagiarism Checker X according to their domain.

At the same time, Writers can choose ProWritingAid or Grammarly if they need an automatic grammar assistant along with a copy detector.
Compare Different Plagiarism CheckersAcceptable formatsFeaturesQuality of examination/Price1. Plagiarism Checker XHTML, PDF, RTF, TXT, EBOOK, ODT and other forms are available for licensed users.Plagiarism percentageMultiple language supportCharacter replacement detectionDownloadable reportBad citation and pa…

How to Avoid Plagiarism in College Essays and Academics - Without Paying $$$

Avoiding Plagiarism Plagiarism means to present someone's work as of your own. Intentionally or unintentionally. 
Copying someone's work or paraphrasing it without citing back to the original (published or unpublished) work might be considered as plagiarism as well. Or representing someone's artistic or technical creation. Understanding Plagiarism Before taking proper action to avoid plagiarism, it is essential to understand plagiarism. Universities often provide plagiarism quiz to help students understand. Wrongly interpreted policies may lead to the same judgments as of the unawareness about the concern. Plagiarism can be of multiple types. In one way or another, the penalties and punishments might be similar. Incidences of placgiarism will first be addressed within the School, and they may apply penalties such as giving you a mark of zero for the piece of work concerned. The University's Academic Misconduct Committee has the power to apply a range of penalties for …

How Financial Aid Letters Often Leave Students Confused and Misinformed

The Department of Education has a model financial aid award letter. It's very different from what schools are actually sending. 
(this story was originally published on ProPublica

The financial aid award letters that colleges send to prospective students can be confusing: Many mix grants, scholarships and loans all under the heading of "Award," "Financial Assistance," or "Offered Financial Aid." Some schools also suggest loans in amounts that families can't afford. 
Take Parent Plus loans, a federal program that allows families to take out as much as they need, after another aid is applied, to pay for their children's college costs. 

As we recently reported with the Chronicle of Higher Education, Plus loans are remarkably easy to get. With minimal underwriting and no assessment of whether parents can actually afford the mortgages, families can end up overburdened by debt. 

Colleges often exacerbate things when their letters layout, or "packa…